Mitsubishi Heading For Trademark Dispute With LaserVue?

Checking the United State Patent And Trademark Office website you find that on 24th January 2008 Mtisubishi applied for the trademark "Laservue" for a new TV:

Word Mark LASERVUE
Goods and Services IC 009. US 021 023 026 036 038. G & S: Televisions
Standard Characters Claimed
Mark Drawing Code (4) STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
Serial Number 77379685
Filing Date January 24, 2008
Current Filing Basis 1B
Original Filing Basis 1B
Owner (APPLICANT) Mitsubishi Digital Electronics America, Inc. CORPORATION DELAWARE 9351 Jeronimo Road Irvine CALIFORNIA 92618
Attorney of Record Ronald L. Taylor
Type of Mark TRADEMARK
Register PRINCIPAL
Live/Dead Indicator LIVE

The thing is they don't own laservue.com, Jay Bansal MD, a laser eye surgeon does. I can just see a long protracted legal dispute commencing soon!

But wait, it gets worse. The next record on the USPTO site is for "LASERVUE HD CUSTOM LASIK":

Word Mark LASERVUE HD CUSTOM LASIK
Goods and Services IC 044. US 100 101. G & S: Laser vision surgery services, lasik eye surgery, refractive eye surgery, refractive cataract surgery
Standard Characters Claimed
Mark Drawing Code (4) STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
Serial Number 77040286
Filing Date November 9, 2006
Current Filing Basis 1B;44D
Original Filing Basis 1B;44D
Owner (APPLICANT) Société de gestion Fovea 20/20 inc. CORPORATION CANADA Suite 201 1100 Beaumont avenue Mont-Royal CANADA H3P3H5
Attorney of Record Richard S. Gareau
Priority Date November 9, 2006
Disclaimer NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "LASIK" APART FROM THE MARK AS SHOWN
Type of Mark SERVICE MARK
Register PRINCIPAL
Live/Dead Indicator LIVE

They don't claim to have sole rights for the use of "Lasik" but would there be some confusion over the Laservue names?

When Mitsubishi mention the product in the press will they use a url based on the Mitsubishi TV.com domain or their Believing is Seeing site? Or will they try and get the Laservue.com domain?